Top 16 Security Testing Tools: Complete Guide for 2025

I’ve worked with enough teams to know how a small mistake in code or setup can spiral into a serious security problem overnight. The good news is that the range of tools available today is broader and more specialized than ever, reshaping how teams build and release software. Security is no longer something to tack on at the end, but it should be built into the process from the start.

What are Security Testing Tools?

Security testing tools are software solutions that uncover weaknesses in applications, networks, and APIs before attackers can exploit them. They simulate real-world threats, detect misconfigurations, and highlight flaws in code or infrastructure so they can be fixed early. As companies depend on web apps, APIs, and cloud services for daily operations, any untested gap can quickly escalate into a breach. By using these tools, organizations gain visibility into their security posture and lower the risk of downtime, data loss, and costly incidents.

Types of Security Testing Tools

Security testing tools come in different forms, each addressing a specific stage of development or type of risk. Some focus on code before it runs, others test applications in real time, and some specialize in mobile, network, or API environments.

Each category brings a different perspective, from preventing flaws at the source to simulating real-world attacks against live systems. Understanding these distinctions helps teams choose the right mix of tools instead of relying on a single approach. The table below highlights the main categories and their use cases:

Security Testing Tools to Consider in 2025

Modern tools cover everything from static analysis and runtime scanning to API-focused testing. Whether you need static analysis, runtime fuzzing, network scanning, or API-first protection, here are the most relevant tools to know in 2025.

1. Pynt

Pynt is an API security testing platform built for modern DevSecOps workflows. It uses context-aware simulations—understanding API schemas, traffic flows, and business logic—to expose vulnerabilities that often go unnoticed. Designed to reduce noise, it focuses on actionable findings and integrates easily into CI/CD environments.

• Features: Contextual API testing, low false positives, automated attack simulations, API discovery from Postman, OpenAPI, and mirrored traffic, remediation guidance, CI/CD integration
• Best for: API-first environments, DevSecOps teams, SaaS platforms.
• Price: Free tier available; enterprise pricing via request. AWS listing shows endpoint-based pricing starting around $18,000/year for larger API sets.
  Integrations: Postman, OpenAPI specs, Docker CLI, mirrored or Burp-recorded traffic.
• Customer review: “What stands out most about Pynt is its seamless CI/CD pipeline integration, allowing automated API security scans without disrupting the development workflow. It intelligently maps out API structures, identifies vulnerabilities (like injection, misconfigurations, or authorization flaws), and provides developer‑friendly remediation guidance.” 

2. Sqlmap

Sqlmap is an open-source, command-line penetration testing tool that automates the detection and exploitation of SQL injection (SQLi) vulnerabilities in web applications. It supports a wide range of database management systems and advanced SQLi techniques, enabling testers to perform deep-level analysis and exploit testing efficiently. Widely used in both red team engagements and security research, sqlmap helps uncover vulnerabilities from basic injection to full database compromise.

• Features: Full support for multiple DBMS, six SQLi techniques (boolean blind, error-based, time-based blind, UNION query, stacked queries, and out-of-band), database fingerprinting, table enumeration, data dumping, file system access, OS command execution via out-of-band channel.
• Best for: Penetration testers, security researchers, web application security testing (especially complex SQL environments).
• Price: Free and open-source under GNU GPLv2.
• Integrations: Integrates with other tools like Metasploit and w3af for advanced exploitation workflows.
• Customer review:  “A single masterpiece for hunting and automating sql injection.” 

3. Burp Suite

Burp Suite is one of the most widely used web application security testing tools, offering powerful features for manual and automated testing. It is a go-to platform for penetration testers and security teams working on web apps and APIs.

• Features: Proxy server, scanner for common security flaws, repeater, intruder for automation, rich extensions via BApp Store.
• Best for: Web apps, APIs, penetration testers, security auditors.
• Price: Community Edition is free; Professional starts at $449/year; Enterprise version with scalable automation.
• Integrations: CI/CD pipelines, Jira, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions.
• Customer review: “Burp Suite Pro is the most essential tool for web app penetration testing—fast, reliable, and always evolving.”

4. OWASP ZAP

OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is an open-source tool developed and maintained by the OWASP community. It’s one of the most widely used options for finding security risks in web applications, both during development and in live environments.

• Features: Automated scanner, intercepting proxy, passive and active scanning, scripting support, and community add-ons.
• Best for: Web apps, developers, and security teams looking for a free and community-driven solution.
• Price: Free (open source).
• Integrations: CI/CD pipelines, Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Docker.‍
• Customer review: “ZAP is an excellent open-source tool for web application security testing—easy to use and backed by a strong community.”

5. SonarQube

SonarQube is a popular static application security testing tool that analyzes source code for bugs, code smells, and security vulnerabilities. It helps teams catch issues early in development and maintain clean, secure codebases.

• Features: SAST scanning, multi-language support, OWASP Top 10 checks, detailed dashboards, and continuous inspection.
• Best for: Development teams, enterprises focusing on code quality and security.
• Price: Community edition is free; Developer, Enterprise, and Data Center editions are paid.
• Integrations: CI/CD pipelines, IDE plugins (Eclipse, IntelliJ, Visual Studio Code), GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps.
• Customer review: “SonarQube helps us maintain code quality while keeping an eye on potential security issues—it integrates smoothly into our CI pipeline.”

6. Metasploit

Metasploit is one of the most widely used penetration testing frameworks in the world. It provides security teams with a powerful platform to test exploits, validate defenses, and strengthen network security through real-world attack simulations. With its large library of community and commercial modules, it remains a must-have tool for ethical hackers and enterprises alike.

• Features: Exploit modules, payloads, auxiliary modules for scanning, post-exploitation tools, automated penetration testing, and integration with commercial vulnerability scanners.
• Best for: Penetration testers, red teams, enterprises, and security researchers.
  
• Price: Free open-source framework; Metasploit Pro commercial version available with advanced automation and collaboration features.
• Integrations: Works with Nexpose/InsightVM, integrates with commercial scanners, and APIs for custom workflows.
• Customer review: “Metasploit is one of the most popular penetration testing frameworks and is used extensively to carry out exploitation and testing.”

7. Acunetix

Acunetix is a commercial web vulnerability scanner designed to detect a wide range of security issues in websites, web applications, and APIs. It specializes in uncovering common flaws like SQL injection and cross-site scripting, helping organizations automate much of their application security testing.

• Features: Automated vulnerability scanning, advanced crawling and scanning engine, API scanning, compliance reporting, and remediation tracking.
• Best for: Web applications, APIs, enterprises, DevSecOps teams.
• Price: Commercial licenses start at around $4,500 per year (varies by edition and deployment).
• Integrations: Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Jira, and other CI/CD and issue tracking tools.
• Customer review: “Acunetix is easy to use and offers great accuracy for scanning vulnerabilities in web apps.” 

8. Checkmarx

Checkmarx is a leading application security testing platform best known for its static application security testing (SAST) capabilities. It helps organizations detect and fix security flaws directly in the source code, supporting a wide range of programming languages and frameworks.

• Features: Static application security testing (SAST), software composition analysis (SCA), infrastructure-as-code (IaC) security, API security testing, and developer-friendly remediation guidance.
• Best for: Enterprises, DevSecOps teams, organizations with large-scale development pipelines.
• Price: Enterprise pricing available on request.
• Integrations: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Jenkins, Jira, and other CI/CD and issue tracking platforms.‍
• Customer review: “Checkmarx integrates well into our CI/CD process and provides detailed reports that help developers fix issues quickly.”

9. Intruder

Intruder is a cloud-based vulnerability scanner designed to simplify continuous security monitoring. It helps businesses identify misconfigurations, missing patches, and emerging threats before attackers can exploit them.

• Features: Continuous vulnerability scanning, proactive threat notifications, cloud and on-prem support, compliance reporting.
• Best for: SMEs, SaaS companies, managed security providers.
• Price: Starts at $101/month for the Essentials plan.
• Integrations: Slack, Jira, Microsoft Teams, Zapier, AWS, GCP, Azure.
• Customer review: “Intruder makes it simple to stay ahead of security issues with clear reports and easy integrations.”

10. Detectify

Detectify is a cloud-based web application security testing tool that automates scans for common security risks and misconfigurations. Built by ethical hackers, it continuously updates its knowledge base with new attack techniques, making it highly adaptive against evolving threats.

• Features: Continuous asset monitoring, automated vulnerability scanning, crowdsourced hacker insights, and misconfiguration detection.
• Best for: Web applications, enterprises with large digital footprints, and continuous monitoring.
• Price: Starting at around $289/month; enterprise pricing available.
• Integrations: Jira, Slack, webhooks, CI/CD pipelines.
• Customer review: “The platform is easy to set up and integrates well into CI/CD workflows, reducing manual effort in vulnerability detection.”

11. Mend.io

Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) is a software composition analysis (SCA) platform that focuses on securing open-source components. It helps organizations manage licenses, detect vulnerabilities in third-party libraries, and automate remediation to reduce risk in modern software supply chains.

• Features: Open-source vulnerability detection, license compliance management, automated policy enforcement, and real-time alerts.
• Best for: Enterprises, DevSecOps teams, organizations relying heavily on open-source components.
• Price: Free tier available; enterprise pricing on request.
• Integrations: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Jenkins, Jira.
• Customer review: “Mend.io makes it easy to identify and fix vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies without slowing development.”

12. Nmap

Nmap (Network Mapper) is a powerful open-source tool for mapping networks and auditing security. It identifies devices on a network, scans for open ports, and detects running services and operating systems. Its flexibility makes it a favorite for both penetration testers and system administrators.

• Features: Network discovery, port scanning, OS detection, service/version detection, Nmap Scripting Engine (NSE).
• Best for: Network administrators, penetration testers, and enterprises monitoring large infrastructures.
• Price: Free and open source.
• Integrations: Works with Zenmap (GUI), Ndiff, Nping, and integrates into many penetration testing frameworks.
• Customer review: “Nmap is indispensable for network scanning and auditing. It’s fast, reliable, and the scripting engine makes it incredibly flexible.” 

13. OpenVAS

OpenVAS (Open Vulnerability Assessment Scanner) is a full-featured open-source vulnerability scanner maintained by Greenbone. It provides comprehensive assessments of networks, servers, and applications by running thousands of vulnerability tests from a regularly updated feed.

• Features: Automated vulnerability scanning, authenticated and unauthenticated scans, daily updated test feed, web-based management.
• Best for: Security teams, enterprises, and managed service providers that need detailed vulnerability assessments.
• Price: Free (community edition); commercial version available as part of Greenbone’s enterprise solutions.
• Integrations: Works with Greenbone Security Assistant (web interface), Greenbone Management Protocol (GMP), and can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines.
• Customer review: “OpenVAS provides thorough vulnerability scans with an up-to-date database, making it a strong choice for enterprise environments.”

14. Pentera

Pentera is an automated security validation platform that simulates real-world attacks to test an organization’s defenses. Instead of static reports, it continuously challenges live environments, showing how attackers could exploit weaknesses in real time.

• Features: Automated penetration testing, continuous security validation, exploit simulations, and actionable remediation reports.
• Best for: Enterprises, financial institutions, and organizations with complex IT environments seeking continuous validation.
• Price: Enterprise pricing available on request.
• Integrations: Works with SIEM, SOAR, and vulnerability management systems.
• Customer review: “Pentera allows us to validate our defenses continuously without relying only on annual pen tests. It reveals how attackers would move inside our network.”

15. Astra Security

Astra Security is a modern PTaaS (Penetration Testing as a Service) platform that mixes automated scanning with expert-led manual pentesting. It’s gained traction for its AI-enhanced testing, coverage across modern assets (web, API, cloud), and emphasis on minimizing false positives.

• Features: Web, mobile, API, and cloud scanning; AI-assisted scans; zero false-positive promise; behind-login crawling; compliance reporting (PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR); browser extension for login recording.
• Best for: SMEs to enterprises needing scalable vulnerability scanning with deeper context and expert validation.
• Price: Plans start around $199/month with tailored offerings for startups and larger clients.
• Integrations: CI/CD pipelines, Slack, Jira, GitHub, GitLab.
• Customer review: “Astra penetration testing is comprehensive and integrates well into CI/CD pipelines, making vulnerability assessment seamless in our development workflows.”

16. ImmuniWeb

ImmuniWeb is an AI-powered application security testing platform that combines automated scanning with expert-driven penetration testing. It helps organizations uncover security risks across web apps, APIs, and mobile applications, while providing compliance support for standards like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.

• Features: AI-driven vulnerability scanning, manual penetration testing, API security testing, compliance reporting
• Best for: Enterprises, regulated industries, web and API security testing
• Price: On-demand pricing starts around $2,080 per scan (ImmuniWeb pricing page)
• Integrations: Jira, Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub, Slack, CI/CD pipelines
• Customer review: “The reports are thorough and easy to understand. It’s a great combination of automation with expert validation.”

Security Testing Approaches and Practices

The way organizations test security can vary depending on their environment, compliance requirements, and risk tolerance. Below is a summary of common approaches and practices in 2025:

Benefits of Security Testing Tools

Security testing tools give organizations a practical way to strengthen their defenses while keeping development agile. They reduce risks, streamline workflows, and help teams stay compliant without adding unnecessary overhead. Key benefits include:

• Early detection of issues: Tools surface weaknesses in code, APIs, and infrastructure before they reach production, saving both time and remediation costs.
• Lower risk of breaches: Automated scans and penetration simulations uncover exploitable gaps before attackers can act.
• Compliance alignment: Many tools map findings to frameworks such as OWASP, PCI-DSS, or GDPR, helping teams prepare for audits.
• Development efficiency: By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, testing becomes automated and continuous, ensuring security checks don’t slow releases.
• Actionable remediation: Instead of just flagging problems, modern tools provide guidance that developers can follow immediately.
• Stronger overall posture: Consistent testing builds resilience against evolving threats and creates confidence among users and stakeholders.

Key Features to Look For in Security Testing Tools

Not all security testing tools are created equal. The most effective ones share a set of features that make them valuable across different environments and team structures. When comparing tools, these are the capabilities that matter most:

• Comprehensive coverage: A strong tool should test across code, APIs, networks, and configurations instead of focusing on only one layer.
• Accuracy of results: Reducing false positives is essential so developers can act on real issues without wasting time.
• Integration with workflows: Look for compatibility with CI/CD pipelines, developer IDEs, and collaboration tools.
• Scalability: As applications grow, the tool should handle larger environments and more complex architectures.
• Customizable reporting: Clear, flexible reports help translate findings into actions for both technical and business teams.
• Regulatory mapping: Some tools automatically align findings with industry standards and compliance frameworks.
• Ease of use: Security testing must be accessible to developers, not just security specialists, so usability is key.

How to Choose the Right Security Testing Tool: Quick Checklist

Choosing the right tool should align with your organization’s size, applications, and long-term security strategy. Here are three core factors to weigh before making a decision:

• Assess your needs: Define what matters most for your environment. Startups may prioritize API testing and CI/CD integration, while larger enterprises often focus on compliance requirements and scalability.
• Review pricing models: Understand how the tool is licensed. Some charge per user or scan, while others offer unlimited use. Free tiers may work for small teams, but enterprises usually require subscription plans with advanced capabilities.
• Check support and updates: Long-term value depends on reliable vendor support and frequent updates. Strong documentation, training resources, and responsive customer service make adoption easier and ensure the tool keeps pace with new threats.

How to Implement Security Testing Tools: Best Practices

Adopting security testing tools effectively requires more than installation. Success depends on embedding them into workflows, maintaining consistency, and ensuring teams know how to act on the results.

• Integrate into development: Run security testing within CI/CD pipelines instead of treating it as a final step. A shift-left approach helps developers catch and fix issues early, reducing costs and delays.
• Schedule regular audits: Automated scans are useful, but audits provide accountability and highlight gaps in configurations, compliance, and tool performance that might otherwise slip through.
• Invest in team training: The value of any tool depends on the people using it. Training developers and security staff to interpret results and apply remediation ensures issues are resolved effectively.
• Enable continuous monitoring: Ongoing monitoring catches new risks as code and environments evolve. Feedback loops between teams create a cycle of improvement that strengthens security posture over time.

Tzvika Shneider

CEO, Pynt

Tzvika Shneider is a 20-year software security industry leader with a robust background in product and software management.

Expert Tip: Cut False Positives Before They Cut Your Velocity

When I first rolled out automated security testing across my team, the number one complaint was not the complexity of the tools but the flood of false positives. Developers quickly lose trust when alerts waste their time. Over the years, I’ve learned that reducing noise is the single best way to keep security and development aligned.

• Prioritize API-aware testing: Target APIs directly since most modern threats exploit them. Context-driven API testing slashes irrelevant findings.
• Automate discovery in real time: Let tools map endpoints continuously so you don’t miss new or shadow APIs.
• Shift-left with context: Run tests early in CI/CD pipelines with validation to avoid overwhelming developers.
• Measure speed impact: Track the effect of testing on delivery timelines to ensure security enhancements, not delays, releases.

Takeaway: Fewer false positives mean faster remediation, stronger trust from developers, and a security program that truly accelerates delivery.

Challenges and Limitations of Security Testing Tools

Even the most advanced security testing tools come with challenges that teams need to consider. These are some of the most common limitations:

• False Positives and Negatives: Tools may report issues that are not real (false positives) or miss critical flaws (false negatives). Both outcomes can reduce developer confidence and slow down remediation efforts.
• Tool Complexity and Learning Curve: Many platforms require specialized knowledge to configure and operate effectively. Without proper training, organizations risk underusing the tool or misinterpreting results.
• Compatibility Issues: Some tools may not integrate seamlessly with specific frameworks, APIs, or CI/CD pipelines. This creates friction in workflows and increases reliance on manual processes.
• Cost and Resource Constraints: Enterprise-grade tools can be expensive, and smaller organizations may struggle to balance the need for comprehensive testing with limited budgets and staff capacity.

Pynt’s Approach to Continuous API Security Testing and Threat Detection

Traditional security scans often happen too late, catching issues right before release or even after deployment. Pynt takes a different approach by embedding continuous API testing directly into the development lifecycle. This ensures that threats are identified and validated at every stage, not just in isolated scans.

Pynt’s model centers on context-aware simulations that mirror real-world attack behavior. Instead of overwhelming teams with unverified alerts, it validates risks in real time and provides actionable remediation guidance. This reduces false positives and allows security checks to run without slowing developer workflows. Key elements of Pynt’s approach include:

• Shift-left integration: Runs within CI/CD pipelines, Postman collections, and OpenAPI specs, so issues are addressed early in development.
• Real-time validation: Uses contextual attack simulations that highlight actual exploitability rather than surface-level alerts.
• Developer-first design: Seamless setup and integration mean security testing runs automatically as part of existing workflows.
• Continuous coverage: Regular automated scans adapt to API changes, ensuring exposure risks don’t accumulate between releases.

Conclusion

Security testing tools give teams the clarity to spot risks early, validate what matters, and act before issues escalate. The real advantage comes from choosing tools that align with your environment, weaving them into daily workflows, and turning findings into action. Done well, this approach builds confidence to release faster while keeping security a constant, not an afterthought.

‍

FAQs

Which tool is best for security testing?

Choosing a single best tool depends on accuracy, ease of use, and alignment with modern workflows. For 2025, the standout option is Pynt, which offers context-aware API testing, integrates into CI/CD pipelines, and reduces false positives through real-time validation.

What are the three types of security testing?

Security testing is often grouped into three main categories, each reflecting how much information the tester has before starting:

• Black-box testing: Simulates external attackers with no prior knowledge of the system.
• White-box testing: Uses full knowledge of source code and architecture to identify flaws internally.
• Gray-box testing: Combines both approaches, where testers have partial knowledge of the system.

What are SCA tools?

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools are designed to secure the use of open-source libraries and third-party components. They scan codebases for known vulnerabilities, license issues, and outdated packages, helping organizations reduce supply chain risks without slowing development.

How to do security testing manually?

Manual testing complements automated scans by uncovering issues that tools may miss. It typically involves a series of structured steps:

• Reconnaissance: Mapping the application or system to understand its structure and attack surface.
• Input testing: Sending unexpected or malicious inputs to see how the system responds.
• Authentication checks: Reviewing login, session handling, and authorization mechanisms.
• Configuration review: Inspecting settings, permissions, and error handling for misconfigurations.

Does security testing require coding?

Security testing doesn’t always require coding, since many modern tools automate the process. Still, having coding skills adds value by enabling custom scripts, deeper analysis of source code, and more effective remediation when complex issues arise.

What is API security testing?

API security testing verifies that application programming interfaces are protected against threats like injection attacks, broken authentication, and excessive data exposure. The goal is to ensure that APIs handle data securely, enforce proper access controls, and resist common exploitation techniques.

What’s the difference between a security audit and testing?

Although both aim to strengthen defenses, they approach security from different angles:

• Security testing: Identifies technical weaknesses in code, APIs, networks, or applications through scans or penetration tests.‍
• Security audit: Reviews policies, processes, and controls against standards or regulations such as ISO 27001, HIPAA, or GDPR.

‍

Learn more about security testing with these resources: